Qualiance International Limitedbusiness model

Tap any area to jump to its detail.

Is it a good business, and why? We read the Red Herring Prospectus through the seven domains of John Mullins' framework: the market, the industry, the company's edge and the team behind it. Every rating follows a stated rule, with the evidence shown.

−10−50+5+10

Each domain has its own score; there is no overall score and no buy or sell verdict. Based on the filing dated 10 Sep 2026. This is not investment advice.

The Qualiance International Limited IPO page Source filing

Macro-market

Is the overall market big, growing and supported by trends?

Market domain · macro level

Not enough evidence

The filing and the sources we checked say too little about this to judge it.

How it was scored: Fewer than two facts found for this domain.

Outside facts: 3 facts found about its market and industry that the filing does not give.

Evidence (0 from the filing, 3 independent)

What credible outside sources say

Found independently, about India
FDI equity inflows in India's manufacturing sector increased by 69% from Rs. 8,37,191 crore (US$ 97.7 billion) during 2004-14 to Rs. 14,14,742 crore (US$ 165.1 billion) during 2014-24.
“The government reports indicate a 69% increase in FDI equity inflows in the manufacturing sector from Rs. 8,37,191 crore (US$ 97.7 billion) during 2004-14 to Rs. 14,14,742 crore (US$ 165.1 billion) during 2014-24.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-10-31
Found independently, about India
India has 133 unicorn startups as of October 2026, with eight new entrants in 2026.
“India has 133 unicorn startups as of October 2026, with eight new entrants in 2026, marking a 25% increase over the same period last year.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-10-31
Found independently, about India
Indian exports are expected to reach US$ 1 trillion by 2030.
“According to Minister of Commerce and Industry, Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution and Textiles Mr. Piyush Goyal, Indian exports are expected to reach US$ 1 trillion by 2030.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-10-31

Micro-market

Is the target customer segment attractive, and does the product beat the alternatives?

Market domain · micro level

Moderate

0 fact(s) in the filing, 2 healthy and 0 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

How it was scored: 0 fact(s) in the filing, 2 healthy and 0 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

Outside facts: 3 facts found about its market and industry that the filing does not give.

Worked out from its numbers

Sales growth: +44.9%
Sales CAGR, 2 years: +43.7%

Evidence (0 from the filing, 3 independent)

What credible outside sources say

Found independently, about Garments & Apparels
In FY26, total exports of textiles and apparel stood at US$ 35.52 billion.
“In FY26, the total exports of textiles and apparel (including handicrafts) stood at US$ 35.52 billion, while imports were recorded at US$ 8.49 billion.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-11-01
Found independently, about Garments & Apparels
The global apparel market was valued at US$ 1.9 trillion in 2025.
“The global apparel market was valued at US$ 1.9 trillion in 2025 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.1% from 2026 to 2034.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-11-01
Found independently, about Garments & Apparels
The market for Indian textiles and apparel is projected to grow at a 10% CAGR to reach US$ 2.3 billion by 2030.
“Market Size The market for Indian textiles and apparel is projected to grow at a 10% CAGR to reach US$ 2.3 billion by 2030.”
IBEF · Primary source · checked 2026-11-01

Industry

Is the industry structurally attractive: suppliers, buyers, rivals, new entrants and substitutes?

Industry domain · macro level

Moderate

0 fact(s) in the filing, 0 healthy and 0 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

How it was scored: 0 fact(s) in the filing, 0 healthy and 0 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

Outside facts: No facts about its market and industry have been found from outside sources yet.

Compared with: Qualiance International, Gokaldas Exports, S. P. Apparels, listed companies the offer document names as its peers. Classified as Textiles & Apparels › Garments & Apparels, 302 listed companies. The model picked Capital Markets, which is not where those peers sit, so treat the comparison with care.

Worked out from its numbers

Listed companies in its industry group: 302
Operating margin across the industry group: 5.8% middle

Competitive advantage

Can the company keep an edge, and does the business model make economic sense?

Industry domain · micro level

Moderate

The filing states operating margin is 21.9% and net profit margin is 15.4% for FY26, with cash conversion at 66% of profit.

How it was scored: 0 fact(s) in the filing, 3 healthy and 2 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

Worked out from its numbers

Operating margin: 21.9%
Net profit margin: 15.4%
Return on equity: 13.8%
Debt to equity: 0.33x
Cash conversion: 66% of profit

Team: aspirations

What do the promoters want from this IPO: to sell down or to grow the company?

Team domain

Moderate

The filing states promoters hold 77.9% and use 0% of proceeds for debt repayment, allocating ₹38.0 Cr for growth activities.

How it was scored: 0 fact(s) in the filing, 1 healthy and 0 to watch on the numbers; not enough measured evidence to rate it strong.

Worked out from its numbers

Promoter holding before the IPO: 77.9%
Proceeds used to repay debt: -0%

Team: execution

Can the team deliver what the industry demands?

Team domain

Not enough evidence

The filing and the sources we checked say too little about this to judge it.

How it was scored: Fewer than two facts found for this domain.

Team: connections

Does the team have the ties across the value chain: customers, suppliers, partners?

Team domain

Not enough evidence

The filing and the sources we checked say too little about this to judge it.

How it was scored: Fewer than two facts found for this domain.

How to read this

What the ratings mean, where the evidence comes from, and what this page is not.

Three kinds of evidence, always labelled

What the company says comes from its own offer document, with the page it came from. It is a claim, not a finding. Worked out from its numbers is arithmetic on the filing's own financial statements and issue terms. Independent sources are outside publications we trust, with the name, tier and date.

How a rating is set

Every piece of evidence points one way: favourable (+1), neutral (0) or unfavourable (-1). The score is the average of those, times ten, so it runs from -10 to +10.
It is an average, not a total: twelve favourable facts score the same as four. Only their balance counts.
Figures worked out from the filing's numbers count double: healthy is +1, to watch is -0.5, weak is -1. A figure and its peer comparison count once.
The company's own statements and the outside facts about its market and industry are each read by the model, which only says which way a sentence points; every sentence stays visible.
“Not enough evidence” appears only when nothing at all was found for the domain.

Which outside sources count

Facts about a company's market and industry come from a fixed list: regulators and exchanges (SEBI, NSE, BSE, MCA, RBI), government and industry bodies, credit-rating agencies, and established business press. Blogs, forums, social media and Wikipedia are excluded. Each is kept with the exact sentence it rests on. We do not check what the offer document itself says against the web: that is SEBI's job.

About the framework

The seven domains come from John Mullins' The New Business Road Test, written for new ventures. We adapt each domain to what an IPO document can show. The author has not reviewed or endorsed this analysis. Read it with the filing, not instead of it.